<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maple Leaf Responds to Bartor Road Corrective Actions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mapleleaf.com/2009/11/maple-leaf-responds-to-bartor-road-corrective-actions-289/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mapleleaf.com/2009/11/maple-leaf-responds-to-bartor-road-corrective-actions-289</link>
	<description>Our Journey to Food Safety Leadership</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Morrrison</title>
		<link>http://blog.mapleleaf.com/2009/11/maple-leaf-responds-to-bartor-road-corrective-actions-289/comment-page-1#comment-2060</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Morrrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mapleleaf.com/?p=289#comment-2060</guid>
		<description>I STILL do NOT trust Maple Leaf products.
I have switched to unprocessed meats. This way I am NOT getting the salts and chemicals that are in processed meats.
I know the food industry wants us to eat more chemicals from Monsanto.
Instead eat MORE fresh fruit and veggies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I STILL do NOT trust Maple Leaf products.<br />
I have switched to unprocessed meats. This way I am NOT getting the salts and chemicals that are in processed meats.<br />
I know the food industry wants us to eat more chemicals from Monsanto.<br />
Instead eat MORE fresh fruit and veggies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://blog.mapleleaf.com/2009/11/maple-leaf-responds-to-bartor-road-corrective-actions-289/comment-page-1#comment-2016</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mapleleaf.com/?p=289#comment-2016</guid>
		<description>We have made a strong commitment to utilizing global best practices and adopting emerging food safety technologies to ensure we provide consumers with safe, great tasting food produced in a safe environment.  For instance, for our Listeria testing program we currently use the fastest test method approved by Health Canada (HC) and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). We have been strongly recommending that HC and CFIA move quickly to review and permit other methods that provide equal levels of sensitivity and specificity to our current methods, but provide results in shorter turnaround times.  We are evaluating one such Listeria method right now and would move quickly to adopt it, if the results would be acceptable to government regulatory bodies.   We recognize that faster results allow our facilities to react sooner to the data, which is critical to continuously improving our programs.

We are aware of the E. coli method that you refer to and like all new technologies for testing, we are monitoring their development and approval process closely.  Thanks for the information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have made a strong commitment to utilizing global best practices and adopting emerging food safety technologies to ensure we provide consumers with safe, great tasting food produced in a safe environment.  For instance, for our Listeria testing program we currently use the fastest test method approved by Health Canada (HC) and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). We have been strongly recommending that HC and CFIA move quickly to review and permit other methods that provide equal levels of sensitivity and specificity to our current methods, but provide results in shorter turnaround times.  We are evaluating one such Listeria method right now and would move quickly to adopt it, if the results would be acceptable to government regulatory bodies.   We recognize that faster results allow our facilities to react sooner to the data, which is critical to continuously improving our programs.</p>
<p>We are aware of the E. coli method that you refer to and like all new technologies for testing, we are monitoring their development and approval process closely.  Thanks for the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Customer</title>
		<link>http://blog.mapleleaf.com/2009/11/maple-leaf-responds-to-bartor-road-corrective-actions-289/comment-page-1#comment-2015</link>
		<dc:creator>Customer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mapleleaf.com/?p=289#comment-2015</guid>
		<description>Maple leaf foods should look at new state of the art food safety tests , such as vacci test .  They now have a test for e-coli that is 50 time more sensitive than any other test out there .  the enrichment time is 6 hours and the sample takes 45 seconds to read .  Same shift testing , more accurate , more sensitive and cheaper for everyone .   They are getting sammonila through the testing stages know .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maple leaf foods should look at new state of the art food safety tests , such as vacci test .  They now have a test for e-coli that is 50 time more sensitive than any other test out there .  the enrichment time is 6 hours and the sample takes 45 seconds to read .  Same shift testing , more accurate , more sensitive and cheaper for everyone .   They are getting sammonila through the testing stages know .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Kerfoot</title>
		<link>http://blog.mapleleaf.com/2009/11/maple-leaf-responds-to-bartor-road-corrective-actions-289/comment-page-1#comment-1995</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Kerfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mapleleaf.com/?p=289#comment-1995</guid>
		<description>A company the size of yours is bound to have something fall through the cracks on rare occasions.  I have no hesitation in continuing to purchase your products as I have done for many years.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A company the size of yours is bound to have something fall through the cracks on rare occasions.  I have no hesitation in continuing to purchase your products as I have done for many years.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://blog.mapleleaf.com/2009/11/maple-leaf-responds-to-bartor-road-corrective-actions-289/comment-page-1#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mapleleaf.com/?p=289#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment.  Food safety has always been a priority at Maple Leaf but since the events of last August we have made significant progress to raise the bar and embed a food safety culture across the company.  Over the past 12-14 months since the inspections in question were conducted, we have invested over $4 million in upgrades including facility improvements and new equipment. We have also implemented over 200 new operating procedures which are based on the best food safety practices in North America, and continually train every one of our employees on these new procedures. 

Today we are a significantly stronger company with a deeply rooted commitment to excellence in food safety. What this means is a culture that is focused on ALWAYS seeking to improve in this area. We aspire to be leaders in this field, which requires us to constantly seek out new ways to get better. I hope this helps understand our perspective.

Michael McCain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment.  Food safety has always been a priority at Maple Leaf but since the events of last August we have made significant progress to raise the bar and embed a food safety culture across the company.  Over the past 12-14 months since the inspections in question were conducted, we have invested over $4 million in upgrades including facility improvements and new equipment. We have also implemented over 200 new operating procedures which are based on the best food safety practices in North America, and continually train every one of our employees on these new procedures. </p>
<p>Today we are a significantly stronger company with a deeply rooted commitment to excellence in food safety. What this means is a culture that is focused on ALWAYS seeking to improve in this area. We aspire to be leaders in this field, which requires us to constantly seek out new ways to get better. I hope this helps understand our perspective.</p>
<p>Michael McCain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a consumer</title>
		<link>http://blog.mapleleaf.com/2009/11/maple-leaf-responds-to-bartor-road-corrective-actions-289/comment-page-1#comment-1811</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a consumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mapleleaf.com/?p=289#comment-1811</guid>
		<description>When you say "Most importantly, we have instituted an intensive program to train our staff and instill in them the belief that food safety must be the number one priority." doesn't that contradict Michael McCain? You say you're now trying to instill in your staff that priority, but didn't McCain state, last year when saying "guilty" that food safety represented the cornerstone of MapleLeaf corporate structure? 
You guys are producing a tons of communication materials, working on many fronts with many messages and different voices. Better ensure consistent messaging or don't be surprise of the level of public scepticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say &#8220;Most importantly, we have instituted an intensive program to train our staff and instill in them the belief that food safety must be the number one priority.&#8221; doesn&#8217;t that contradict Michael McCain? You say you&#8217;re now trying to instill in your staff that priority, but didn&#8217;t McCain state, last year when saying &#8220;guilty&#8221; that food safety represented the cornerstone of MapleLeaf corporate structure?<br />
You guys are producing a tons of communication materials, working on many fronts with many messages and different voices. Better ensure consistent messaging or don&#8217;t be surprise of the level of public scepticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
